A Filthy Film on Islam
September 18, 2012 – 11:09 amRead the history of how the thousands of British and Indian troops were trapped in Afghanistan and were slaughtered in 18th century. Was it right or wrong is entirely a different story. Not every adherent of religion is God-conscious as my brother David
No Americans or Muslims want these killings to be done in present day Afghanistan or Muslim lands in the Middle East due to the mad behaviour of a pornographic film on Muhammad the prophet or one of the Christian priests claiming his RIGHT to insult and burn the Quran.
Would any of us say that this sort of freedom protecting a crazy individual producing a filthy film or burning the Quran under the pretext of freedom of expression is more important even if say some 20,000 American troops are going to be butchered by the Afghan tribes. And of course some 50,000 Afghans may die of bomb aerial bomb attacks by Americans?
We have to use practical common sense judgments in dealing with situations¬. We can not blindly stick to constitutional amendments and the so called “stupidity” of blasphemy.
After all these amendments are meant to make people happy and peaceful, they are not impossible laws of nature that can never be altered.
We have to get rid off our one track mind and think practically to bring peace to all”.
Life is more precious than a stupid pornographic movie that the West wants to save in the name of freedom of expression.
This post was submitted by pa.amin.

8 Responses to “A Filthy Film on Islam”
Dirt Pictures of Princess Britain: BAN:
People in the East can easily see the double standard and hypocrisy of the West in dealing with issues that they call freedom of the press and freedom of expression.
The present issue of the publication of the topless pictures of Prince William’s wife is there for all to make comparisons.
A French court on Tuesday banned Closer magazine from any further publication or resale of topless pictures of Prince William’s wife Catherine.
An injunction granted by the court also ordered the magazine to hand over all files of the pictures in its possession to representatives of the royal couple within 24 hours.
Her pictures published Okay or Not Okay is least of our concerns.
When Muslims were appealing for a similar action on the concoction, lies, fabrication by Salman Rushdie on his book Satanic Verses, Muslims were asked to shut their mouths and said blasphemy laws on Islam is inapplicable in the West.
It means Islam and its mighty Prophet can be insulted and no ban, no restrictions, no warning to the publisher, no court cases allowed.
Same story continues about the pornographic movie on the mercy to the world- Prophet Muhammad. Google had told Muslim organisations not to intervene in their policies and Google refused to ban the Movie on the Youtube.
Politicians like the Conservative MP George Walden defended Rushdie’s freedom of expression in an article entitled ‘West is Best’, when Fay Weldon used her Counter Blast pamphlet on the Rushdie affair to denigrate the Koran.
What do we see ultimately? The cruelty and intolerance of a small but powerful faction of Islam was met in the West not with the combination of toughness and sensitivity which was required, but with all the intolerance, insensitivity and triumphalism which the West had traditionally shown towards one of its oldest religious enemies.
The world thrives on hypocrisy and double standard.
By pa.amin on Sep 19, 2012
Muslims should not go out of control with rage and anger and took matters into their own hands forgetting the noble character of the Prophet they claim to defend.
While they have every right to protest against the anti-Islam film, they should not cross boundaries and limits in injuring or killing the innocent people.
In response to the defamatory film Innocence of Muslims insulting Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him); Al-Azhar Senior Scholars Council (ASSC) condemned these attacks, urging in the meantime the Muslim masses to keep away from exceeding the limits of Islam punishing the innocent for the sins of the guilty.
As reported by the Al-Azhar Council came up with proper methods in dealing with the issue. It had reminded Muslims of self-constraint, to control the limits and to adhere to the Islamic codes of conducts.
Repel [evil] by that [deed] which is better; and thereupon the one whom between you and him is enmity [will become] as though he was a devoted friend. (Qur’an 41: 34).
Prophet Mohammad was attacked and insulted during his lifetime and the waves of attacks continue to this day.
He was a man who controlled his anger and had emphasized that the strongest man is not the one who can wrestle others to the ground but the one who can control himself during the time of anger.
The strong is not the one who overcomes people by use of his physical strength; rather he is the one who controls himself while in anger. (Al-Bukhari)
By pa.amin on Sep 19, 2012
By pagomo on Sep 30, 2012
Oh! sekejap lagi nanti ada ejen Yahudi yang menggunakan nama “Masyarakat Muslim” menuduh posting ani menyuruh berlaku keganasan. Bila Islam dihina ia berdiam diri saja. Bila muslim cuba membela agamanya nanti akan difitnah kononnya menimbulkan sentimen keagamaan. Pelik sungguh dajjal tersebut. Penyokong kafir barat rupanya.
By PC Phreak on Oct 20, 2012
Bukan pulang apa, sorry ah to all christian, what if we create a film insulting your religion? im sure that christian will ask google to ban it and im sure google will ban it.. and every christian will do the same, and rage will be among the christian. and same as any religion, if we insult your religion which your whole life you belief in, and said will not torn it down, based on “freedom right” how do you feel?
By NA29 on Oct 28, 2012
The fact that film is just tactic to bring Islam down, that why Google and the west don’t want to ban it because they want Islam to be crush. Beside what else they want with the film anyway? fame? I’m sure there are thousand way to become fame without insulting other..
By NA29 on Oct 28, 2012
Bukan pulang apa, sorry ah to all christian, what if we create a film insulting your religion?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Reply to NA29
Salams, No Muslim will EVER do such a thing, No Muslim will produce a movie insulting Isa Alaihissalam, No Muslim is a true Muslim unless he honours Isa Alaihissalam. Even if a rogue atheist does it world Mslims will get angry. Won’t they? They know it
By pa.amin on Nov 11, 2012
The Quran teaches that God had sent messengers to every people on the face of the earth: Islamic tradition says that there had been 124,000 such messengers. The Quran points out that it is not bringing a message that is essentially new. Muslims emphasize their kinship with other religions. To quote the Quran
“DO NOT ARGUE WITH THE PEOPLE OF THE EARLIER REVELATION OTHERWISE THAN IN THE MOST KINDLY MANNER—UNLESS IT BE SUCH OF THEM AS ARE SET ON EVIL DOING—AND SAY: ‘WE BELIEVE IN THAT WHICH HAS BEEN BESTOWED UPON US, AS WELL AS THAT WHICH HAS BEEN BESTOWED UPON YOU: FOR OUR GOD AND YOUR GOD IS ONE AND THE SAME, AND UNTO HIM WE ALL SURRENDER OURSELVES” Chapter 29: Verse 46
The Quran singles out apostles who were familiar to the Arabs—like Abraham, Noah, Moses and Jesus who were the prophets of the Jews and Christians.But the Jews say that Jesus was a false prophet
By pa.amin on Nov 11, 2012